![]() News editors affixed the terms “unverified” and “unsubstantiated” to all discussion of the issue in the responsible media. The furor quickly passed, the next news cycle came, and the American media has been largely reluctant to revisit the report over the months since.Īlmost immediately after the dossier was leaked, media outlets and commentators pointed out that the material was unproven. A lot of ink and pixels were also spent on the question whether it was appropriate for the media to publish the dossier. Trump himself publicly refuted the story, while Trump associates denied reported details about their engagement with Russian officials. The greatest attention was paid to the first report, which conveyed salacious claims about Trump consorting with prostitutes in Moscow in 2013. This seemed to complement general statements from US intelligence officials about Russia’s active efforts to undermine the US election. ![]() Taken together, the series of reports painted a picture of active collusion between the Kremlin and key Trump campaign officials based on years of Russian intelligence work against Trump and some of his associates. The collection of Orbis reports caused an uproar when it was published online by the US website BuzzFeed, just ten days before Donald Trump’s inauguration. The dossier is composed of a batch of short reports produced between June and December 2016 by Orbis Business Intelligence, a London-based firm specializing in commercial intelligence for government and private-sector clients. Recent revelations of Trump campaign connections to Russia have revived interest in the so-called Steele Dossier.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |